Post-processing work is perfectly fine however, extensive manipulation should be disclosed in the comments.Ĩ) You must own or have license for images you submit. Disable NSFW posts in reddit settings if you do not want them in your feed.Ħb) Bullying users by following them around the subreddit and harassing them will get your comment removed with possible grounds for a ban.ħ) No photos that are digital in origin. This applies to sexualised comments including innuendo. nudity, gore, sexĦ) Constructive criticism of photos is always welcomed here, but personal attacks, brigading, soap-boxing, disrespectful or marginalising the work or its subject are unacceptable.Ħa) Comments complaining about the existence of NSFW posts in a NSFW flaired post are subject to removal, with possible grounds for a ban. If you want to do this, please use dedicated communities such as /r/photomarket.ĥ) Flair NSFW posts e.g. Post an album to share more at once.Ĥ) No trading or selling. , or use for auction/thrift store finds, family photos, and so on.Ģ) Maximum of three image posts per day. If you do not know some of the required information, state that in either the title or top-level comment e.g. Share your film photographs and discuss anything analog! Rules - View in more detailġ) Include the film stock, lens, and camera used in your post title. Kds315* wrote: Looks more like a carshow to me than wedding photography.Announcement: Check out the /r/Analog Instagram! -=- Check out the Best of the Year 2020 winners! Welcome!Ī subreddit for lovers of analog photography. I don't tend to worry with blown highlights as long as the part I am focusing on is correct (for me). No I shoot in the Leica M9 in M mode so exposed for the near side of the car (as I would a backlit portrait face). Posted: Sun 12:28 am Post subject: Leica M9 exposure Highlights are horribly blown out though, was the M9's meter fooled by the reflection of the shiny bodywork?
Iangreenhalgh1 wrote: Nice car, but I think you mean 1966. Last edited by MatthewOsbornePhotography on Sun 12:25 am edited 1 time in total Retro Leica M9 Wedding by MatthewOsbornePhotography_, on Flickr Leica M9 Wedding Car by MatthewOsbornePhotography_, on Flickr Amazing car that had been lovingly restored. The nicest wedding car I have seen this year was a 1966 Ford Mustang Convertible. It was a vintage themed wedding so a shiny '63 plate Rolls would not really of worked. Yes maybe, if the couple getting married are fond of 3 wheelers! Makes a nice change from the usual Rolls and Bentleys. Posted: Sat 11:19 pm Post subject: Re: Wedding Cars - Ford Mustang 1966 Convertible But a wedding car? What next? a Yellow three wheel Reliant with 'Trotter's Independent Trading' on the side? I'm in England, I know they have a cult following, I see loads of them broken down at the roadside every bank holiday. Iangreenhalgh1 wrote: MatthewOsbornePhotography wrote: Posted: Sat 11:10 pm Post subject: Re: VW Camper Van Wedding Hire Photo Thanks, sorry i'm used to posting in the discussion section. Thread moved from "Film SLR/TLR Cameras" because it does not talk about the camera at all. MatthewOsbornePhotography wrote: Orio wrote: Posted: Sat 10:10 pm Post subject: Thanks Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
CONTAX 645 PORTRA PRO
Not cheap either!Īttila wrote: Nice to see pro who still use film, great shoot as usual, thank you to sharing it here. i'm guessing you are not in the UK? They have a cult following here. OMG that's one of the silliest things I've seen, why on earth would anyone pick one of those rotten old vans as a wedding car? MatthewOsbornePhotography wrote: iangreenhalgh1 wrote: Posted: Sat 9:55 pm Post subject: VW Camper Van Wedding Hire Photo I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! Iangreenhalgh1 wrote: OMG that's one of the silliest things I've seen, why on earth would anyone pick one of those rotten old vans as a wedding car? LeicaM9/M8/M3/M2/D800/Rolleiflex SL66E/Mamiya RZ67 ProII/Mamiya M645 1000S/Fuji GF670/Fujica GS645/PentaconSix/ARAX-CM/Nikon FM/Yashica MG-1/Moskva-5/Voigtlander Bessa R3A not that I didn't know Kodak Portra was amazing, just generally. I'll add more tomorrow too.Īfter a good run with the Leica M9 these photos have restored my faith in film!. Here is a sampleĬontax 645 + Kodak Portra 400 + Zeiss Planar 80mm f2 T lens medium format wedding photographyĬontax 645 Wedding by MatthewOsbornePhotography_, on Flickrįor more see my blog. MatthewOsbornePhotography wrote: I'm just starting to edit some film shots from a wedding back in August.
Posted: Sat 9:31 pm Post subject: Contax 645 Wedding with Kodak Portra 400, UK.